![]() Your CIA, your Defense Department, wanted to understand the paranormal. Science fiction got a run for its money from the US Government for decades of the Cold War and beyond. Mitchell, Apollo 14 Lunar Module pilot, moves across the lunar surface as he looks over a traverse map during extravehicular activity (EVA). Probably not because it defies physicalism.Twitter facebook Email This article is more than 5 years old.Ī new book tells the secret history of the federal government’s long investigation into mental telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition – for defense. ![]() Some may go all the way and say mind is everything. Instead of mind being an epiphenomenon of the brain, it’s now affecting the brain. But it is on the list of things mainstream science can’t explain.Īs I see it, it shows a top down approach to mind. Surely your second sentence contradicts the first one? I didn’t say it was supernatural but that it hasn’t been explained by science. It’s not just change in perception it’s change in brain chemistry that can be observed by a researcher. This is easy to observe as it happens in every single episode □ ordinary wine in an expensive bottle, singers on x factor who are awful but the crowd get excited. ![]() ![]() People can easily be fooled into thinking something is different if they're told it is e.g. That's not supernatural, it's human behaviour and a change of perception. That’s beyond the ability of science to explain. Solely due to the mind’s belief in the healing. It has no active ingredient with which to heal. I’d start with something simple like the placebo. Show me clocks being knocked off mantlepieces and we can study it. Whereas to Max Planck, it was everything. Your idea that because science can’t study the immaterial, it doesn’t exist. I think that's the underlying assumption and /or objection to most claims of the supernatural.Įither it's the first one which is quite feasible and entirely possible to study and account for without being supernatural or it's knocking the clock off which is fantasy and has no evidential basis to justify study and hence doesn't need explanation.Įither way supernatural is a just fiction. We can define supernatural as the mind operating non locally, or strictly limited to the brain. Knocking a clock off a mantlepiece, no chance and has never been observed or tested. A thought consisting of electrical impulses could well generate enough of a magnetic field to have a micro-minuscule effect on the path of a passing particle (maybe electron or photon) so yes telekinesis could exist. I'll have a go but we'll stumble at the first hurdle of definition. I'd need an example of what posters are referring to. Telekinesis? Telepathy? Ghosts? Premonition? What phenomena are we even discussing? This discussion is going along merrily when there's no sign of what is the issue. well, we're back in the realms of speculation.Īnd then if you're a skeptic, you have to be careful that you're applying the same level of scrutiny that you apply to other phenomena you accept as real. If it meets the secondary condition of standing up to scrutiny, then it becomes a new aspect of the natural. That's quite a wide question, but generally it defines itself by having a tangible or perceptible influence on the world external to the person relating the experience.Īnd frequently that is the case with certain experiences. If accuratey related, it's certainly evidence of their experience, but you'll also need evidence of how well their experience reflects reality. If you're asking people to believe in things without evidence (and evidence which stands up to scrutiny at that) then you're dealing with something else.Īre people asking others to believe without evidence, or is their experience their evidence? Sceptics keep trying to steer the subject onto the believers having to provide evidence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |